Page 22 - 20230530_vp_02_D

vascular professional | issue 02 · 2022

Papers
1. Anwar MA, Idrees M, Aswini M et al. Fate of the tributaries of sapheno diofrequency-powered segmental ablation or 1470-nm endovenous laser
femoral junction following endovenous thermal ablation of incompetent ablation with radial-tip fibers (Varico 2 study). J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat
axial vein - A review article. Phlebology. 2019;34(3):151-155. Disord. 2018;6(1):31-40.
2. Disselhoff BC, der Kinderen DJ, Kelder JC et al. Five-year results of a ran- 11. Mühlberger D, Morandini L, Brenner E. Venous valves and major super-
domised clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous ficial tributary veins near the saphenofemoral junction. J Vasc Surg. 2009
vein with and without ligation of the saphenofemoral junction. Eur J Vasc Jun;49(6):1562-9.
Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(5):685-90. 12. Mumme A, Hummel T, Burger P et al. Die Crossektomie ist erforderlich!
3. Flessenkämper I, Hartmann M, Hartmann K et al. Endovenous laser Ergebnisse der deutschen Leistenrezidivstudie. Phlebologie 2009;3:99-
ablation with and without high ligation compared to high ligation and 102.
stripping for treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: Results of 13. O‘Donnell TF, Balk EM, Dermody M et al. Recurrence of varicose veins
a multicentre randomised controlled trial with up to 6 years follow-up. after endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein in randomized
2016;31(1):23-33. trials. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2016;4(1):97-105.
4. Gauw SA, Lawson JA et al. Five-year follow-up of a randomized, 14. Proebstle TM, Möhler T. A longitudinal single-center cohort study on
controlled trial comparing saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the the prevalence and risk of accessory saphenous vein reflux after radiofre-
great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980nm) using local quency segmental thermal ablation of great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg
tumescent anesthesia. J. Vasc. Surg. 2016;63:420-428. Venous Lymphat Disord. 2015;3(3):265-9.
5. Geier B, Stücker M, Hummel T at al. Residual stumps associated with 15. Rass K, Frings N, Glowacki P et al. Same Site Recurrence ist More
inguinal varicose vein recurrences: a multicenter study. Eur. J. Vasc. Endo- Frequent After Endovenous Laser Ablation Compared with High Liga-
vasc. Surg. 2008;36(2):207-210. tion and Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein : 5 year Results of a
6. Hamann SAS, Giang J, De Maeseneer MGR et al. Five Year Results of Randomized Clinical Trial (RELACS Study). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.
Great Saphenous Vein Treatment: A Meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc 2015;50(5):648-56.
Surg 2017;54:760-770. Review. 16. Rasmussen LH, Bjoern L, Lawaetz M et al. Randomised clinical trial
7. Hartmann K, Stenger D, Hartmann M. Rafi-Stenger L. Endochirurgie comparing endovenous laser ablation with stripping of the great saphe-
versus offene Chirugie der Varikose. Versuch einer Wertung. Hautarzt nous vein: clinical outcome and recurrence after 2 years. Eur J Vasc Endo-
2017;68:603–613. vasc Surg. 2010;39(5):630-5.
8. Hartmann K. Endovenous (minimally invasive) procedures for treat- 17. Theivacumar NS, Dellagrammaticas D, Beale RJ et al. Fate and clinical
ment of varicose veins: The gentle and effective alternative to high liga- significance of saphenofemoral junction tributaries following endovenous
tion and stripping operations. Hautarzt 2020;71(Suppl 2):67-73. laser ablation of great saphenous vein. Br J Surg. 2007;94(6):722-5.
9. Hartmann M. Die Crossektomie. In: Phlebologie für die Praxis. De Gruy- 18. Wallace T, El-Sheikha J, Nandhra S et al. Long-term outcomes of en-
ter 1991 und 2001. dovenous laser ablation and conventional surgery for great saphenous
10. Lawson JA, Gauw SA, van Vlijmen CJ et al. Prospective comparative co- varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2018;105(13):1759-1767.
hort study evaluating incompetent great saphenous vein closure using ra-

20