Page 16 - 20230530_vp_02_D
P. 16

vascular professional | issue 02 · 2022









            One year after EVLA, a phone interview was performed   Of course, it depends  on the body size of patients, at
            asking about any changes of their neurological symp-  40cm from the saphenofemoral junction, the posterior
            toms. As a result, symptoms disappeared in 44%, relie-  arch vein flows in GSV (> fig. 4).
            ved in 48% and were not changed in 8% of the patients
            > fig. 2. No patients reported any restrictions in their
            quality of life.
                                                                            40       30
                                                                      50

                                                                 60



                                                                  fig. 4 > At the point of 40cm from the saphenofemoral
                                                                  junction, saphenous nerve comes close to GSV. Below this

                                                                  of saphenous nerve injury apparently arise.
               fig. 2 >  Change of neurological symptoms at 1 year    © Junichi Utoh  point, the nerve runs side by side with GSV and the risk    © Junichi Utoh
               after EVLA
                                                               Below this point, it is known that saphenous nerve comes
            Discussion:                                        close to GSV and runs side by side in a narrow segment
            Nerve injury was observed in 3.1% of patients. The inci-   of saphenous compartment. Therefore, GSV ablation for
            dence of nerve injury was 4 times higher in cases of    more than 40cm may cause some damage to the surroun-
            ablation length of more than 40cm when compared to   ding structures.
            those under 40cm (5.2% vs 1.3%). A similar tendency was    Indication of below-knee GSV ablation is still con-
            observed in patients who underwent radiofrequency ab-  troversial.  In Japan,  there  is a dilemma.  Half of  vascular
            lation of incompetent GSV during the same observation   surgeons agree with it because of the benefit of a high
            period in the Kumamoto Vascular Clinic > fig. 3.   curability of EVLA. But the other half disagrees with it
                                                               because of a high risk of nerve injury. If saphenous nerve
                                                               injury becomes preventable, more patients would have
                                                               the opportunity to receive more curable EVLA in the
                                                               future.
                                                                  The ablation power used in this study was 9W. Re-
                                                               viewing the clinical results, we considered that expo-
                                                               sure  of  below  knee  GSV  to  9W  was  too  large.  There-
                                                               fore, some new improvements would be necessary to pre-
                                                             © Junichi Utoh  vent nerve injury in below-knee GSV ablation.

               fig. 3 >Incidence of nerve injury after EVLA and RFA  A new protocol for below knee GSV ablation:

                                                               We have recently changed our protocol for GSV ablation.

                                                                              Above Knee GSV  Below Knee GSV

                                                               power          7 W              5 W
                                                               targeting LEED    50-70 J/cm    20-25 J/cm
                                                               ablation length   36.9 ± 5.4 cm    13.5 ± 5.6 cm
                                                               actual LEED    53.4 ± 9.6 J/cm   21.7 ± 3.8 J/cm












            14
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21